Not saying that anyone will actually take my suggestion seriously, but I just linked this blog on HSS, referencing previously written thoughts on awards for young equitation horses that the budget stricken riders usually end up on at Finals . . . so I thought I better get over here and expound slightly upon that as the original post (below, Feb. 27th) did not give the details I thought it did.
Here it goes, in brief . . . because the market's finally picked up a bit and I've got work to do :)
Renewed inspiration: While this idea originally brewed in 2005, my interest was renewed by a recent announcement from USEF regarding a new non-profit organization, "Big Eq Dreams" that will secure 3'6" Medal horses, by donation, and offer them to young riders whose goals are burdened by truly legitimate financial concerns. (COTH thread with text of USEF announcement)
I'm not going to bother shooting holes in it here, they were blown out on COTH. I wholey applaud the motivation and intent, and hate to squash the miniscule ray of hope it provides, but I really can't get over the obvious flaws.
Alternative concept: In keeping with the constructs are already in place, reward a different set of traits.
There are a variety of ways a young rider can acheive their equestrian goals, but a successful trip at Medal Finals seems to be the one everyone is focused on. This is certainly respectable, a ribbon out of 300 is an enormous accomplishment, all stars must be aligned and the gods must smile in your favor.
No doubt you will need the best horse, the best instruction and the best preparation to get that ribbon. No doubt this will cost a lot of money.
But year after year young riders show up with what they have, and lay it on the table. On that table you see some, but not all of the components necessary to take a ribbon. On it you see the sacrifices made to get to that point . . . one rider opts for the less fashionable tack and attire, another clearly hasn't invested enough in training, another rides a horse of questionable athletecism, soundness, or sanity. All sacrifices made that reflect the incontroversible: You can't spend as much here if you want to make it there.
Inevitably we see those that have, in my opinion, made the soundest sacrifice of all. They swapped push-button for no button, 8 years for 4 years, First Year Green for Baby Green. These riders looked ahead and saw the most important component of the ribbon winner is the horse they rode in on. Financially strapped they find a good quality youngster and prepare themselves for one, two or three years of blood, sweat and tears, in hopes of one day making it around at Harrisburg or Syracuse. They're pretty sure there's still no chance at a ribbon, but the goal has become to just jump around clean on the horse you brought along. That suddenly means so much more than a $0.75 piece of satin.
This entire idea began with a trip a saw at '05 Medal Finals - a stunning grey steps into the ring, his charcoal points immediately give away his age, and his sticky step betrays his confidence. A guts and glory rider, stylish to a point but clearly more concerned with effectiveness, gives the ride of her life, cracking into a smile at several points as the horse puts a foot-and-a-half between himself and the fences. All distances safe and consistent, all rails up, all jumps jumped, she pulls up, drops the reins, and gives him the fuss he deserves. Both horse and rider are beaming.
Clearly this horse has the potential to be a star, clearly this rider is enormously talented- and isn't that the point of these Finals? To say to the world, "HEY. This person is GOOD. We might have a future star here."
From there it seemed easy to develop a system that not only gives riders that can't afford a horse of Finals caliber a reason to aim for Finals anyway, but also encourages and rewards that which we all bemoan as lost in today's equestrian sport- the effective rider. The non-poser.
Recognition of riders successfully competing on green mounts would accomplish both of these goals. It requires no additional trips, and no equine welfare. Whether it is a title presented during awards to the "Best Young Equitation Horse", or a more structured set of additional ribbons for those competing on "First Year Equitation Horses", the whole philosophy is already in place and simply needs to be acknowledged, and rewarded.
I would venture to say a horse that competes well at Finals benefits even more than his rider; they'll carry that on their resume to the tune of several $$$, as well as assisting in many more young equitation careers. Riders working to make up a Big Eq horse, and their owners, would have serious interest in the success of a horse in this field. Imagine sale ads that read, "Awarded Best Young Equitation Horse, USEF Medal Finals 2010", instead of "Jumped around with his eyes closed first time at Harrisburg" (yeah, sure).
Young riders could bank their careers on the success and sale of such an animal- literally, by turning around and putting that money towards a horse that can give them a legitimate chance at a ribbon.
Etc, etc. That's the superbly brief rundown. The blog post from 2005 about the grey horse at Harrisburg is out there in cyberspace somewhere, will see if I can dig it up. Otherwise, I am very interested in taking this concept into reality and am probably in the position to do so. Would like to hear thoughts from the industry (ahem, comment please) and see what support for it there truly is.